U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
June 21, 2007 11:13 PM UTC
15 Comments
The URL is http://www.angie2008.com
Angie live blog at Blue America last week. It’s a little early, but she’s laying the groundwork for this run and she has netroots support.
People need to look closely at these two and see what they are really about. Right now it seems that it is just a beauty/political contest.
What real substance does these candidates have. I’m not saying they don’t substance what I’m saying is that the debate is about money raising, name recognition et. when it should be on who is the best leader.
Don’t we want the person with the most substance and ability to make change happen?
That’s why I said it bothered me… it’s only about contributing or volunteering. Why would I do either when she railed on her camp from last year? And when will she get a more professional site… one with actual information.
Compare it to Betsy Markey’s:
http://www.markeyfor…
It make’s AP’s look like a 7th grade website project.
Damn she’s got a nice smile. As an angie supporter, I have to say the image contrast is going to tough for AP to get over.
Who does? Angie or Betsy? Maybe this should be a poll… 🙂
But you do have to give Ang some credit for having that famous flawless hair-do. Everytime I see her not a hair is out of place.
she’s got a warm smile. I wish that didn’t matter in politics, but we all know image matters.
so personally, since she wasn’t referring to unpaid volunteers. She was referring to the paid staff. You mentioned that you volunteered a great deal for her last year. I’m sure she wasn’t referring to you, since you weren’t on the payroll.
I believe Angie was specifically referring to the upper echelon of her paid staff and as a full-time volunteer on her campaign, I was very pleased to hear her voice what so many of us had also felt–that a few (not alot, but a few) of the paid staff were not up to the tasks they were assigned.
From the sound of it, Angie’s got a top notch campaign team lined up, starting with the guys that ran Perlmutter’s campaign.
Angie has two websites up, just so you know. One is the website Dan mentioned above and the other is her own with loads of information on it, while her current campaign website is being revamped.
thanks
I’m sure you’ll find it, Joe.
http://www.angiepacc…
You’re right–it has lots of info about Angie and what she’s up to.
Thanks again.
I hadn’t seen that one either… thanks for the heads up